Great Expectations by Charles Dickens: The mystery of two endings —03 by Robbie Cheadle

Published by

on

Did you know that Charles Dickens re-wrote the ending of Great Expectations?

He made this change after he’d submitted the final chapters to the printers in June 1861. He was apparently persuaded to make the change by a close friend who felt he should end the book in a way that left the reader hopeful that Pip and Estella might get together. It is recorded that Dickens was reluctant to make this change but was eventually won around to the idea of a more conventional ending that he had originally written.

The initial ending depicts Pip accidentally meeting Estella on the streets of London. Estella has lost her first abusive husband to death but has remarried. Pip recounts this chance meeting as a once-off and there is not expectation by the reader that the two will ever get together. Pip does express a sense of satisfaction and peace that time has softened Estella and made her kinder.

The published ending depicts Pip accidentally discovering Estella in the abandoned garden of Satis house (Miss Havisham’s house that burned down) when he returns to visit Joe and Biddy after many years abroad. Estella has been widowed after an unhappy life with her abusive husband. In the final lines of the novel, Pip comments ambiguously that he “saw the shadow of no parting from her.”

Harry Furniss 1910 13.7 cm by 8.9 cm (5 ⅜ by 3 ½ inches), framed

“I saw no shadow of another parting from her.” — p. 461.
Dickens’s Great Expectations, Library Edition, facing p. 456.
Scanned image and text by 
Philip V. Allingham.
https://victorianweb.org/art/illustration/furniss/26.html

This ending leaves the reader with the impression that Pip and Estella might finally be together but the nature of Dickens’ writing and the use of the word shadow hints at possible mists to come.

The misty marshes near Pip’s childhood home in Kent is an important setting in this book and is used as an instrument by Dickens to symbolize danger and uncertainty. Pip initially meets Magwitch the convict in the graveyard on the marshes on a misty evening and that has significant implications for his future. The search for the convicts by the police also happens in the mist as does Orlick’s kidnapping of Pip. The day Pip travels to London after receiving news of his great expectations is also depicted as being misty, as is the night when Magwitch arrives at his door later in the book.

Old Orlick means murder – Picture credit: https://www.charlesdickenspage.com/illustrations-great-expectations.html. This is one of 21 etchings by Frederick William Pailthorpe (1838-1914) are from the Robson & Kerslake edition from 1885.

The hint at shadows and mist in the closing paragraphs with Estella in the garden at Satis house could thus easily hint at further turmoil to come for Pip.

From another perspective, by the end of the novel, the reader is aware that Pip misreads situations and makes incorrect assumptions so the idea that this could be just another wistful idea or ‘expectation’ is not fully expelled.

Personally, I felt that the original ending would have been better and would have given Pip a real chance to move on with his life and find someone better and nicer than Estella. I did not like her even if she was a product of Miss Havisham’s upbringing.

What do you think? Which ending do you think is better for this novel? Do you think Pip and Estella get together based on your reading of the original ending?

10 respuestas a «Great Expectations by Charles Dickens: The mystery of two endings —03 by Robbie Cheadle»

  1. Avatar de Cindy Georgakas

    Great post and I have to agree with you that the original ending is better, Robbie!!
    🩷

    Le gusta a 2 personas

    1. Avatar de robbiesinspiration

      Hi Cindy, it made more sense in light of Estelle’s character but Dickens ended up going with the people pleaser ending.

      Le gusta a 1 persona

      1. Avatar de Cindy Georgakas

        Oh interesting, Robbie. I guess that makes sense!

        Le gusta a 2 personas

  2. Avatar de Ephemeral Encounters

    I have really enjoyed these posts Robbie thank you 💖

    Le gusta a 2 personas

    1. Avatar de robbiesinspiration

      My pleasure, Maggie 🙏

      Le gusta a 1 persona

  3. Avatar de richardbist

    I find it interesting when a writer changes the ending of a story and I often wonder about the motivation.

    I also wonder if the book would have had the same impact, or an even a bigger impact, with the original ending.

    Another great post, Robbie.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

    1. Avatar de robbiesinspiration

      Thank you. Dickens was certainly swayed into believing the happy ever after ending was better. This book is very famous so it probably was the right choice thanks for reading this trio of posts 💚

      Le gusta a 1 persona

  4. Avatar de robbiesinspiration

    Thanks for sharing, Juan

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  5. Avatar de Priscilla Bettis

    I agree with you, Robbie. Seeing Pip move on with an unknown but wide future opening before him, full of people and loves he’d yet to meet, would be a more satisfying ending to me.

    Le gusta a 1 persona

  6. Avatar de Resa

    Robbie, I did not know this.

    I’d need to think about it more, but both endings work for me at this point. Although like much of Dickens work, endings aren’t endings, but dubious beginnings. Or both sad and hopeful endings at the same time.

    I love this article on Great Expectations. Great work, Robbie!

    Le gusta a 1 persona

Replica a robbiesinspiration Cancelar la respuesta

Previous Post
Next Post